By Agreement Through Pondering Views

Note the italic words that are normally dropped from the offer or oversloughed if they are included. When the Buddha says that one cannot walk through logical derivations, conclusions or analogies, he says that one cannot always trust his sense of reason. When he says that we disagree by thinking about the points of view (i.e. what we already believe) or by the probability, he says that one cannot always rely on one`s common sense. And of course, you can`t always trust teachers, sacred writings or traditions. So where can you place your trust? You must put things to the test in your own thoughts, words and actions, to see what really leads to suffering and what leads to its end. In the Kalama Sutta, Buddha said: „… Do not go through relationships, legends, traditions, writing, logical agreement, conclusions, analogies, unity by reflective points of view, probability or thought: „This contemplative is our teacher.“ If you know for yourself that: „These qualities are skillful; these qualities are beyond reproach; these qualities are praised by the wise; these characteristics, when accepted and realized, lead to well-being and happiness, „then you should go in and stay in them.“ In this case, Kalamas, do not go through relationships, legends, traditions, writing, logical conjecture, conclusion, analogies, unity by reflective points of view, probability or thought: „This contemplative is our teacher.“ Now, if you`re waiting for quick access to an absolutely reliable authority, it may seem like a catch: if you`re not smart enough to trust your own judgment, how can you see who`s really smart? But it is not a trap. It`s just the way we have to work when we develop any type of skills – their appreciation for good carpentry, for example, increases when you master carpentry itself – and Buddha makes that`s the way to approach the dharma: as an ability to master. As with any skill, your inner sensitivity and confidence grow to those who are truly wise in competence, only through your willingness to learn. It turns out that, despite the pervasiveness of provisions to limit both direct and „indirect“ allocations, there is no clear general answer to the question of whether an indirect transfer of an asset is made by a party simply because there has been a change of control over that party. On the contrary, each agreement must be analysed taking into account all its provisions.

Nevertheless, some general principles of the law seem to govern the interpretation of these clauses. At the same time, Buddha realized that not everyone would have the time or propensity to submit to this doctrine, so he organized a division of labor.